One other family of Jews was not treated

Telemarketing data you can trust: clean, deduped phone leads, industry filters, and ready-to-call lists to accelerate pipeline growth.
Post Reply
samia95
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2025 11:01 am

One other family of Jews was not treated

Post by samia95 »

The King sent his navy after the ship. It was apprehended and the captain was hanged from his own yard-arm. The Jews, with their possessions, were then given safe escort over to France. so decently during the expulsion. It was offloaded (minus possessions) onto Thames estuary mudbanks at low tide. All perished. It is noteworthy that while both these incidents are matters of historical record, a BBC2 TV ‘documentary’ broadcast early in 1991 about the expulsion of Jews from England only thought fit to mention the second incident, and deliberately suppressed mention of the first because it reflected well on the integrity of the man who delivered our land from the pestilence of Jewish usury and who was generally celebrated for his piety,valour and sense of justice.

This was the same ‘documentary’


In which the sole comment on the usurious interest rates all datasets charged by Jewish bankers at that time—2 pence in the shilling per week—was that such interest rates were “usual”. No ‘cause-and-effect’ link was suggested in the programme between such rapacious usury, the hatred for Jews which grew up among all classes of English people and the expulsion of all Jews from our land. Any such suggestion, needless to say, would have been “anti-semitism of the worst possible kind ... deeply offensive”, etc.
Unfortunately for England and for Britain as a whole, the Jews were allowed to resettle in Britain by the dictator Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell needed money for his New Model Army and the Jews were prepared to lend him all he needed in order to get a toe-hold in England once again. In correspondence between Cromwell and the leader of European Jewry at that time, Menasseh Ben Israel, the proposition was canvassed by Cromwell that the Jews be allowed to have St.

Image

Paul’s Cathedral in London where Cromwell


once stabled his cavalry horses) as their central synagogue. This unholy correspondence may still be examined at the British Museum.
As Captain Ramsay, M.P., made plain in his book The Nameless War, Cromwell, as a commoner, had no authority to disregard the Statute of Jewry. Indeed, the Statute has never lawfully been revoked. Hence all laws which Jewish Members of Parliament have instigated [e.g. the Race Relations Act] since they were permitted to re-establish themselves, may be viewed as unlawful.

In this context, it is also noteworthy that by decree of Queen Elizabeth the First, all Blacks were expelled from Britain In the Acts of the Privy Council dated 11th August, 1596 it was decreed.


Her Majestie, understanding that there are divers


Blackamoors brought into this realme, of which kinde of people there are already too manie, considering how God has blessed this land with great increase of people of our own nation ... those kind of people should be sent forth of the land”.
Though King Edward and Queen Elizabeth lived hundreds of years apart, the wording of their laws (and numerous other actions in their lives) demonstrates quite clearly that they saw themselves as the protector of their people and realised that they had an obligation to put the interests of their own folk, however lowly, first before foreigners. In short, they were patriots. What a contrast there is between those two great monarchs and those who are responsible for our nation’s affairs today!
Post Reply